Culture

Punk at The Met – Chaos to Couture

Punk: Chaos to Couture[Pics: Nadia Neophytou] 

The toilets are apparently too clean for those who can recall visiting CBGB’s back in the day, before the epicenter of New York’s punk movement closed its doors in 2006. I  never did get to see, so I don’t have first-hand knowledge, but from what I’ve read and heard, it doesn’t sound like anywhere I would’ve ventured near, even if I had been fortunate to visit the Big Apple – or the club itself – during those heady days.

But the Met Museum’s Costume Institute has created a replica – albeit with less graffiti and a much more neutral smell it seems – of 315 Bowery St in NYC, where the Ramones once held a regular residency. The museum has also created a copy of the boutique that stood – and still stands – at 430 King’s Road in London, where Vivienne Westwood and husband at the time Malcolm McLaren sold their wares. That too, doesn’t escape scrutiny, as I overheard someone say, “it’s at least 10 times bigger than the actual shop.” But the exhibition explores these two folds on either side of the Atlantic, where punk played out – in Britain as more of a working class phenomenon, and in the US, more of a middle-class one.

Punk: Chaos to Couture

The exhibition looks at the aesthetics of punk, and how those features played out in the clothes designed from the late 70s up until now (there’s a Burberry studded jacket that is dangerously delish). The garments are collected into four parts of the D.I.Y aesthetic – Hardware, Bricolage, Graffiti and Agitprop and Destroy, with music playing overhead. So, as you peruse pieces from the Comme des Garçons 2013 collection, with the bits of suits that’ve been cut up and stitched to the waist of the dresses, images of The Clash play in videos ahead, creating an audio and visual accompaniment to the display.

Punk: Chaos to Couture

But there are no mohawks nor original fashion-not-as-fashion items worn by the likes of Syd Vicious or Johnny Rotten on show. Curator Andrew Bolton says this was done on purpose, so as to “avoid the usual cliches and stereotypes associated with punk.” 

“Today, when we think about punk fashion, we think about an iconic uniform of t-shirts, black leather studded jackets and skinny jeans, leather pants or bondage trousers. But this look was adopted late in the cycle, around 1979 when punk in its purest form was almost over,” he says. “The same can be said of mohawks, which we deliberately avoided.”

He acknowledged the contradictory nature of staging such an exhibition: “From the beginning I was keenly aware that punk, like any street style, loses its potency when presented in the context of a museum, so that was the main reason not to include any original garments from Syd Vicious or Johnny Rotten or Patti Smith or Debbie Harry. That is why they are only represented on film, where their fashions could be appreciated more accurately on the body and in performance.”

Punk: Chaos to Couture

As for his comment on what punk’s main anarchists would make of this exhibition? “Punks may be appalled to have this as the focus of museum exhibition, but I believe they would have taken a perverse sense of pride and honour in this. Punks, like many innovators, challenged the boundaries of high art and low art effectively democratizing creativity and invention. They broke all the rules and allowed anything to be possible. We wanted to present punk in a respectful, even reverential, manner that shows punk’s impact, not just on the fashion but on the art in general.”

Wonder what the late Malcolm McLaren – the same man who said he was responsible for turning popular culture into “nothing more than a cheap marketing gimmick” – would have made of it all?

Punk: Chaos to Couture

Punk: Chaos to Couture

Punk: Chaos to Couture

Punk: Chaos to Couture runs from May 9th to 18th August at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

 

4 comments

  1. One thing I have actually noticed is that there are plenty of misconceptions regarding the lenders intentions while talking about foreclosed. One fantasy in particular is the bank wishes to have your house. The financial institution wants your hard earned money, not your house. They want the bucks they loaned you having interest. Averting the bank is only going to draw a foreclosed realization. Thanks for your publication.

  2. Wow, wonderful blog layout! How lengthy have you ever been blogging for? you make blogging glance easy. The overall glance of your site is fantastic, as smartly as the content!

  3. whoah this blog is magnificent i like studying your posts. Stay up the great paintings! You recognize, lots of individuals are hunting round for this information, you can aid them greatly.

  4. Things i have often told people today is that when evaluating a good internet electronics shop, there are a few factors that you have to factor in. First and foremost, you should make sure to look for a reputable and reliable shop that has received great reviews and rankings from other individuals and industry advisors. This will make certain you are getting through with a well-known store that can offer good service and help to their patrons. Many thanks for sharing your thinking on this weblog.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.